A. The relationship between the parties 1) Plaintiff A is a person who has received treatment at the right angle at the Defendant Hospital, and Plaintiff B is the wife of Plaintiff A, Plaintiff C, and Plaintiff D are the children of Plaintiff A. 2) G is a medical specialist at the Defendant Hospital, and retired on November 9, 2013.

B. On May 26, 2011, the Plaintiff A provided outpatient treatment at the F clinic located in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu in order to treat the pain of the shoulder part of the Defendant Hospital, while performing the outpatient treatment.

6. Around 24, who was admitted to the Defendant Hospital, G diagnosed the Plaintiff as “the superior superior officer and the first superior officer” to the Defendant Hospital.

2) According to the above diagnosis, G: (a) deemed that the surgery for Plaintiff A is required to be performed; (b) notified Plaintiff A; and (c) on July 7, 201 with the consent of Plaintiff A, the Defendant hospital stated that Plaintiff A entered the surgery name in the medical record site, etc. for the field of scalvology and scalvology in the order of scalpology and scalpology, etc.; (c) according to the witness G’s testimony, it is merely an electronically input entry into the health insurance corporation for convenience at the time of reporting it to the Health Insurance Corporation; and (d) the surgery name that Plaintiff A actually performed with respect to the Plaintiff is “scalpology and scalpology in the order of scalpology and the first diagnosis name with respect to Plaintiff A.” (hereinafter “instant operation”).

)을 시행하였다. 원고 A는 이 사건 수술과 관련하여 피고 병원에 2011. 7. 6.부터 2011. 7. 11.까지 입원하였다. 3) 원고 A가 이 사건 수술 이후 계속하여 우측 견괄절 통증을 호소하여 G가 이에 대한 염증치료를 지속적으로 하여 왔고, 다소 호전 양상을 보이다가 2011. 10. 28.부터 다시 통증이 악화되는 양상을 띄�다.

4 Accordingly, the plaintiff A re-hospitalized the defendant hospital on November 19, 201, and began to receive hospital treatment in relation to the right check.

Nevertheless, it is not possible.