2. We examine ex officio prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the defendant for ex officio judgment.

This court held a joint hearing of each appeal case against the judgment below, and each of the crimes listed in No. 8 through No. 12 as stated in the table of crime No. 2 as stated in the judgment of the court below in the judgment of the court below is concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act and should be sentenced to one punishment pursuant to Article 38(1) of the Criminal Act. Thus, among the judgment of the court of first instance and the judgment of the court of second instance, the part concerning each crime listed in No. 8 through No. 12

(2) The judgment of the court below, which sentenced the collection of additional charges, is the sum of the parts on each crime listed in the separate sheet No. 8 through No. 12 in the judgment that is reversed ex officio as above, and the remaining parts on each crime listed in the separate sheet No. 1 through No. 7 in the judgment that is the remaining parts on each crime in the separate sheet No. 8 through No. 12 in the judgment that is reversed ex officio. Thus, this court shall decide to additionally impose additional charges and reverse the whole amount of the judgment of the court of second instance. However, even if there are reasons for ex officio reversal, the defendant's assertion of unreasonable sentencing as to each crime listed in the separate sheet No. 1 through No.

3. Determination on the assertion of unfair sentencing (the part concerning each crime listed in the table Nos. 1 through 7 in the judgment of the second court) requires that the defendant confessions and reflects the crime of this case, and the equality in the case of being tried together with the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, which became final and conclusive.