A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 2,500,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

1. Defendant B and Defendant B were the chairman of the Emergency Countermeasure Committee against D’s redevelopment, and Defendant A had been willing to demand a king market interview to the king audience without prior promise, with 20 members of the said Emergency Countermeasure Committee, including E, F, G, and H, who are members of the said Emergency Countermeasure Committee, and members of the said Emergency Countermeasure Committee.

On June 3, 2015, at around 09:10, the Defendants entered the 11-Sang-ro market room for 11-Sang-si, Cheongang-si, 2015, and demanded an interview with the second floor market room for the redevelopment project. They were demanded by the victim I, etc. of the viewing public official who prevented the opening of the market room and forced to enter the market room for the redevelopment project.

However, the Defendants, the aforementioned E, F, G, and H do not comply with them and remains there until they are arrested as flagrant offenders at the site of 09:50 on the same day, the Defendants, and the police officers who arrive at the site of 09:50 on the same day, and they stay there, without justifiable grounds, in

The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.

Accordingly, the defendants should leave the victim jointly with members E of the above Emergency Countermeasure Committee.

The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and time as the preceding paragraph, leaves the place as above.

In response to the order of the Gu, the police officers, such as the Gyeonggi Provincial Police Agency and K, have resistanceed during the process of arresting the police officers as flagrant offenders, and have left the right edge of the K.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of the on-site order of the police officer K.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Defendant B’s partial statement

1. Examination protocol of Defendant A by the prosecution;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant A by the police;

1. Statement of the police officer to I;

1. The K's statement;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to a criminal report (related video CD attachment);

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Article 319(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act (in response to withdrawal), and Article 136 of the Criminal Act.