If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On June 13, 2016, the Defendant, while under the influence of C convenience points in Seopopo City B around 22:02 on June 13, 2016, she seeed the appearance of the victim D (names, booms, 20 years of age) who is an employee, on the display of things, and she saw the victim's her her son with his her left hand from behind the victim to her her son her son her son

Therefore, even though the victim of play was a sexual indecent act against the defendant, the defendant, who was arranging the re-speak, was speaked by the victim's own hand, with his/her son's son's tampt, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to D;

1. A criminal investigation report (to attach a photographic recording of theCCTV image analysis confirmation);

1. Application of the CCTV closure photographs and CCTV closure photographs at C convenience stores to the Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 298 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order;

1. A favorable circumstance for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, taking into account the following circumstances, the reason for sentencing of the sentence as ordered: Recognizing the facts of the crime and reflecting it; the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment for the same kind of crime: The victim again commits an indecent act even though he/she made the victim's sexual indecent act; the victim seems to have suffered considerable sexual humiliation and mental shock; there is a record of criminal punishment for this type of crime; in particular, on May 22, 2014, he/she was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving driving), and on October 23, 2014, he/she committed the instant crime without being familiar with the repeated offender during the period of repeated crime even after the execution of the said sentence was completed; the victim has committed the instant crime; and the victim must submit personal information, such as prosecution and drilling methods, Defendant's age, and the Defendant's environment.