If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

The Defendant is a driver of Oralba.

around 10:05 on June 22, 2013, the Defendant is proceeding with the use of a road without a central line in the direction of the main industry company in the direction of the main industry company in the direction of the central office and the front of the main office in the Gwangju Northern-gu.

When starting after stopping, the driver's seat in front of the driver's seat of the E-motor vehicle driven by D, which is proceeding in the same direction from the right side due to the mistake that does not well see the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the E-motor vehicle, is shocked with his front wheels, and the part of the victim F (the age of 78), which was going to fraud, exceeds its shock with his front wheels part, thereby incurring about six weeks of stability for the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Entry in a statement on the occurrence of a DNA traffic accident;

1. Each entry into the actual traffic accident investigation report and diagnosis report;

1. Application of each video statute to CCTV photographs, accident sites, and accident images;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of the workhouses is not somewhat weak; however, the Defendant’s negligence in relation to the instant accident is relatively insignificant; the Defendant has no criminal history other than the fine for negligence once every 23 years; and the Defendant’s attitude to recognize and reflect all of his mistake in the trial process is taken into account.