beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.06 2014가단70274

손해배상

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 12,302,175 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from January 30, 201 to July 6, 2015, and the following.

Reasons

1. The establishment of damage claim;

A. The facts of recognition (1) around January 30, 201, the Defendant, along with the Defendant’s apartment located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, intended to remove the suspicion that the Defendant was in the Plaintiff’s math (hereinafter “the body of the instant case”) with the so-called “scambling method” from the Defendant’s apartment located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, thereby injecting foreign substances into the Plaintiff’s math (hereinafter “instant procedure”), and caused the side effects such as salt, etc. on the upper body of the instant case, making the math worse.

(2) Since May 2012, September 2012, and March 2013, the Plaintiff spent KRW 916,100 as the king medical expenses, including the Plaintiff’s operation to remove the reflectors of the parts of the instant upper part of the Defendant’s wife, but at present, the Plaintiff’s math contains about 3 cm in width, about 3 cm in vertical length, and about 3 cm in vertical length, and needs to carry out the reflectors in the future. The expenses are KRW 16,654,400.

(3) around 2000, the Plaintiff had injected halog on the part of the instant wife. From that time, the Plaintiff continued to suffer cruel treatment, including the guidelines, and continued to undergo cosmetic treatment. The Plaintiff had been in need of cosmetic surgery even before the instant procedure was performed.

[Reasons for Recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap 1, 3 through 11, 13, 14, and Eul 1 (including each number in the case of additional numbers), each description or image of Gap 1, 3, 14, and Eul 1 (including each number), witness D, E's testimony, each fact inquiry results on the National Health Insurance Corporation, the results of the entrustment of physical examination to the head of E's school affiliated with E's university, the purport of the whole pleadings, as a result

B. According to the above facts of determination, the defendant is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the act of this case.

C. However, it is also recognized that the Plaintiff had already been in a state where cosmetic surgery was required due to the suspicion on the part of the body of the instant case. Accordingly, the post-treatment caused by the instant procedure is competition between the Defendant’s instant procedure and the Plaintiff’s king evidence.