If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. Around 17:05 on October 201, 201, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s normal restaurant business by allowing customers, who were in the restaurant with approximately 10 minutes of a 10-minute spaw, such as a 17:05 mar, to get out of the marth, without any reasons, to take a bath within the “D marn,” operated by the victim C (the 55-year-old), who was in the future of Busan (the 55-year-old), to take a bath in the “D mar,” without any reason.

2. The Defendant damaged the property that could not be aware of the market price due to the fact that (a) a portable gas rash, boomed in hand, was laid down in the door mold of the place, and (b) a part of the door mold was destroyed by the Defendant’s destruction of property at the time and place of the preceding paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of investigation reports (general Acts and subordinate statutes);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment. Article 366 of the Criminal Act

2. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

3. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

4. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.