When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2015. 7. 10. 23:00경에 술에 취해 안동시 B에 있는 ‘C 가요주점’에 술에 취한 상태에서 찾아가 위 주점에 출입한 사실이 없었음에도 업주 D에게 “지갑을 놓고 갔다. 내 지갑을 달라.”며 약 30분 동안 행패를 부렸고, 같은 날 23:35경 위와 같은 사실로 112신고를 받고 출동한 안동경찰서 E지구대 소속 경사 F으로부터 주점 영업에 방해가 된다는 이유로 다른 곳으로 자리를 옮길 것을 요구받았으나, 오히려 경사 F에게 “야이 씹할놈들아, 니들이 뭐냐”라고 욕설하며 자리를 옮겨가는 것을 거부하였고, 피의자의 인적사항을 확인하고 귀가조치 시키기 위하여 현장에 출동한 경위 G, 경위 H, 경사 I가 경사 F과 함께 피고인을 다른 곳으로 옮기려 하자, 피고인은 드러누우면서 경사 F의 입을 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the handling of reported duties of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol to F and J Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order include all the circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, which are favorable circumstances such as the defendant's age, character and environment, and conditions for sentencing as shown in the oral proceedings, and the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case at the same time while under the suspension of execution, and that the defendant led to confession and is in depth against the defendant, a certain amount of money deposited by the defendant, and that the defendant's family members want to have a preference against the defendant, and thus the social support basis for the defendant was relatively small.