특수협박
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (fact-finding) is that the Defendant only operated 3 and 4 vehicles in order to verify whether the damaged vehicle has a problem with the Defendant’s vehicle in the front direction of the horn at the rear direction, not immediately operated the vehicle in order to threaten the victim.
Nevertheless, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case. The court below erred by misunderstanding facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.
2. The court below rejected the above assertion by the defendant, claiming the same as the reasons for appeal in this case. The court below's decision is just and it is not erroneous in the misapprehension of facts as alleged by the defendant, and there is no error of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts as alleged by the defendant.
Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.