2. The judgment of the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects the fact that the defendant's family members appeal the defendant's prior action, etc. are favorable to the sentencing.

However, the Defendant committed the instant crime again during the period of repeated crime committed for the same kind of crime even though he had a history of criminal punishment, and committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime for the same crime; the lower court sentenced to a punishment lower than the lower limit of the recommended sentence (one year of imprisonment) in the sentencing guidelines; narcotics-related crimes are highly malicious in the society and have a high risk of recidivism; thus, there is no special reason to change the sentence of the lower court when the lower court was in the first instance trial; and considering the various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentence that the lower court sentenced is too unreasonable, considering the following circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.