except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On March 29, 2019, from around 08:50 to around 09:00, the Defendant interfered with business, the Defendant: (a) spits the victim’s “D” car page operated by the victim C in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu from around 08:50 to around 09:00; and (b) spits the victim’s spits in the indictment in the employee E indictment that restrains the spits. However, according to the records, it is recognized that the Defendant spits the spits against E, not the victim, but the employee E. who is an employee. Therefore, even if this part was modified ex officio, the Defendant

The phrase "I see. .. Mespit .. ...... spit spit spit spit spit spit .......

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the carpet business of the victim by force.

2. On March 28, 2019, at around 09:05, the Defendant received a 112 report that he is suffering from disturbance of algos at the places specified in the foregoing paragraph (1) and received a statement from G in the circumstances surrounding the Seoul Labor-gu Police Station F District, Seoul, Nowon-gu Police Station, to refrain from disturbance, and spited the fat of the G’s face.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report handling.

3. Around 18:30 on April 11, 2019, the Defendant: (a) laid the I cab driven by the victim H in the vicinity of the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dae-gu, and then, (b) brought the victim to the Gongung Station in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the taxi fee even if he was dead.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such, and caused the victim to drive the victim to the king Station in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired economic benefits equivalent to 38,300 won of taxi fares.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Each written statement of E and H shall be prepared.