사해행위취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The Plaintiff’s ground for appeal cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is not significantly different from the allegations in the judgment of the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted to the court of first instance shows each evidence submitted to the court of first instance, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are recognized as legitimate (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2007Da1548, Jun. 17, 2008, the first date after H’s death; 2) the Defendants asserted that the agreement on division of inherited property was reached on Oct. 15, 2012, which is the date on Oct. 15, 2012, the date on which the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the Defendants was received, and (3) the documents and accompanying documents related to each of the instant real estate are difficult to confirm the certificate of registration and the written agreement on division of inherited property as of Jun. 29, 2007, which is the date on which the grounds for registration was stated in the register.
2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.