A. The Plaintiff is the owner of 152 square meters in the place of Gangseo-gun, Kangwon-gun (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. The net P is the owner of the building listed in the attached list on the instant land (hereinafter “instant building”).

C. The deceased on December 27, 1978, and the deceased on the deceased on the part of the deceased Q and his heir had the Defendant (Appointed Party), B, the deceased on the part of the deceased on the part of the deceased on December 27, 1978, and there were children between the deceased Q and the deceased on the part of the deceased on the part of the deceased, D, E, F, and the deceased on the part of the deceased on the part of the children.

On the other hand, the deceased on July 26, 2002, and his heir I, J, and K, who are children, and the deceased on December 6, 2004, and the deceased on December 6, 2004, and his heir M and N, who is the spouse, are spouse L, children.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, Defendant (Appointed Party) B, the heir of the network P, who was the owner of the building of this case, and Defendant C, are obligated to remove the building of this case and deliver the part of the site to the Plaintiff among the land of this case.

[On the other hand, the designated parties K, J, and F shall submit each written reply to the effect that they did not raise any objection to the removal of the Plaintiff’s building of this case at the first date for pleading, and the Defendant (Appointed Party B) also submitted a written reply to the effect that they did not raise any objection to the removal of the Plaintiff’s building of this case at the first date for pleading, and stated at the first date for pleading. 3. If so, the Plaintiff’s claim is reasonable and acceptable.