Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

1. Defendant A is a person who operates passenger transport business (sub-city bus) by being assigned a representative director of (oilB) B as of September 02, 2013.

Notwithstanding the fact that a transport business entity or a person who is not a transport business entity is unable to operate a passenger transport business with or without any consideration by using all or some of his/her commercial vehicles, the Defendant, who was appointed as the representative, had a 25 chartered bus with no consideration from September 02, 2013 to December 23 of the same year run a passenger transport business by using a son who is not a transport business entity, using the 25 chartered bus with no consideration as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

2. Defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of bus transport vehicle transport service business, etc.

As stated in paragraph (1), the Defendant, a representative director, operated the Defendant’s business as above, thereby violating the restrictions on the operation of passenger vehicles.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Automobile registration certificate and the automobile register;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the details of rental buses;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Article 90 subparagraph 3 of the Passenger Transport Service Act and Article 12 (1) of the same Act;

B. Article 93, Article 90 subparag. 3, and Article 12(1) of the Passenger Transport Service Act by the defendant limited liability company B

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse (Defendant A);

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;