However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

At around 01:20 on July 14, 2019, the Defendant: (a) on the street in front of “C” Macheon-si B; (b) on the taxi operated by the victim D (the 49-year-old-si); and (c) on the part of the victim, the victim tolded the victim of the destination “I will not know about the “I will like to do so”; and (d) on the part of the driver, “I will cut back if I would refuse to do so,” and “I will cut back.” As the victim stoppedd, I am at will, without any option, cut down the key within the vehicle, and obstructed the business of the victim’s taxi operation by force for about 20 minutes until the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of each statute of the D and F

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, under the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant who has been punished several times for the same kind of crime, is against his or her mistake and reflects his or her mistake, and under the favorable circumstances, the defendant's previous conviction, age, family environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the conditions of sentencing.