2. The judgment of the defendant reflects his depth on the crime of this case, has a hearing impairment, and is likely to be adequate for economic circumstances.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the occurrence of the instant accident caused by the Defendant’s negligence did not recover from damage, such as agreement with the victim even though the victim suffered personal and material damage; (b) although the commission of the instant crime was long, there was a history of having been punished several times due to the crime related to violence; and (c) the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime; and (d) all other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too too unreasonable,

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.