However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

At around 20:10 on January 2, 2015, the Defendant, at the main point of “D” located in Boan-gu, Manan-gu, Sinan-gu, Sinan-gu, Sinan-si, Manan-gu, where the Defendant drinked the Victim F (year 52) who was the representative of E, who was in his/her service, and performed drinking, at one time the victim was discharged from his/her service, due to beer who was a dangerous object on his/her customer.

In this respect, the defendant used dangerous things to put the victim in an open room for treatment days to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The sentence shall be determined as shown in the disposition, taking into account the following: (a) the following factors: (b) the type 1 (Habitual Injury, Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodily Injury, Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodily Injury and Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodily Injury) (Act No. 9-2) (Special Mitigation) (Special Mitigation Area); (c) minor injury, non-execution of punishment (decision of sentence] several times; (d) contingent crimes are all times;