beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2017.06.28 2017고단118

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 118"

1. On November 2016, the Defendant, upon receiving a proposal from an employee in charge of the phishing crime (hereinafter “D”) who was aware of the receipt of the text message from the Defendant’s receipt of the message message on the job offering, agreed to pay 1% of the total amount of money to the account designated by the Defendant at the expense. The Defendant conspired to commit the phishing crime by receiving the money from an unspecified domestic victims by misrepresenting his/her employees, etc. from the investigative agency, and sending it to the account designated by the Defendant. The Defendant, in turn, conspired to commit the phishing crime by receiving the money from the victims to the account under the name of another (hereinafter “one-time passbook”).

2. On December 7, 2016, at a place where it cannot be known about 11:30 on the victim E’s name, the scam scam scam scameded with an investigator belonging to the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor’s Office, and phone called with the victim E to the effect that “I would return money deposited to the said account in the name of the Financial Supervisory Service, known to the same effect as it was used for the crime of fraud, if I would return money deposited to the said account, after confirming the participation of the party’s criminal act.” The scamed acquired KRW 10 million from the victim’s new bank (Account Number G) account in the name of F on the same day, and KRW 5.8 million from the bank (Account Number I) account in H’s name, respectively.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the above-mentioned person who was infinite, by deceiving the victim, and by deceiving the victim.

3. On December 7, 2016, at a place where it cannot be known about 1:53 on December 7, 2016, the victim J’s personal name or misrepresentation of the public prosecutor’s office belonging to the Government Local Public Prosecutor’s Office, and by telephone, “the account under the name of the party is used for the commission of fraud, thereby causing additional damage.”