2. In full view of the following factors: (a) the Defendant made verbal abuse to a police officer who performs his/her legitimate official duties and received the face of a police officer; (b) the Defendant’s face is not good; (c) the elements of unfavorable sentencing are against the Defendant; (d) the Defendant’s wife and two children are living security recipients; (e) economic conditions are not good in supporting the Defendant; and (e) other favorable factors of sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (e) the scope of recommended sentences of sentencing guidelines (i.e., imprisonment between January and August) and the sentencing guidelines, such as the circumstances after the crime, by taking into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s sentence against the Defendant is too uneasible; and (b) the Defendant’s wife and two children were sentenced to a fine of KRW 700,000 due to damage to public goods in 207.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.