2. There are circumstances that can be considered in light of the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and the defendant did not have the same power as the defendant, and appears to be not good for the health of the defendant.

However, the crime of this case is committed by deceiving the victim of KRW 500 million under the pretext that the defendant would buy gold at a low price, and the nature of the crime is bad, the amount of damage is large, and the damage has not been recovered so far, so a sentence equivalent to the liability of the crime is inevitable.

In addition, in full view of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and background of the offense, means and consequence of the offense, etc., various sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the circumstances after the offense, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed appropriate, and it cannot be deemed that it is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit.