(However, the judgment by “creditor” is deemed to be “Plaintiff” and “debtor” to be “Defendant”: Article 208(3)2 and Article 150(3) and Article 150(1) of the Civil Procedure Act (a) of the Civil Procedure Act (i.e., the judgment by the Defendant only submitted a formal written objection that does not dispute the Plaintiff’s dismissal or claim after being served with the original copy of the instant payment order, and (ii) the Defendant was absent on the date for pleading without complying with the recommendation to submit a substantive response without submitting a subsequent written response, and thus, the Defendant is deemed to have led to a confession of all the Plaintiff’s assertion pursuant to Article 150(3) and (1) of the Civil Procedure Act).