However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is engaged in the business of driving Cone Star Co., Ltd.

On September 20, 2017, the Defendant, at around 18:30, driven the above van on the road in the city of Kimpo-si, 133 Mapo-si, Kimpo-si, 133 Mapo-si, and continued to turn to the left at the entrance of the apartment at the 908 square meters from the entrance of the apartment.

At the same time, there have been many residents including children, and it was not easy to secure the view due to a short time, so the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty to closely see the front door and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right are

Nevertheless, the defendant's failure to see the right side and the right side of the defendant's driving so that the victim D (W, 5 years old) who was walking on the left side from the right side of the defendant's driving without discovering the victim D (W, 5 years old) is negligent, and the defendant's driving part of the front part of the knife of the knife of the knife, and caused the victim to go beyond the floor.

The defendant continued to stop by hearing that the parents of the victim's parents who had observed the above shock situation have stopped and sound, but he thought that it was no relation with him, and that it proceeded with the victim's body part, which was used on the floor as above, in the case of the defendant's driver's failure to view the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right

Accordingly, the Defendant caused the death of the victim due to the above occupational negligence due to the injury of the external brain.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A survey report on the actual situation and a report on the occurrence thereof;

1. A death certificate;

1. Making teas;

1. Camer of an accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field medication, on-site and vehicle photographs, and motion picture photographs;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;