1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court as to the Defendant’s grounds of appeal, the lower court is justifiable to have convicted the Defendant of the remainder of the facts charged except for the portion not guilty of the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds as indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the criminal intent of

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the records, the lower court was justifiable to have rendered a not-guilty verdict on the remainder of the facts charged except for the portion found guilty among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning on the grounds that there was no evidence of crime. In so doing, the lower court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, exceeding the bounds of

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.