If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On April 11, 2016, the Defendant: (a) when his vehicle was controlled by the violation of spirits, and the fine for negligence was imposed; (b) sought in the public service center located in the area of blocking spirits 6, Cheongpo-ri, Cheongpo-ri, Cheongpo-ri, Cheongpo-si, Cheongpo-si, around 16:20 on the same day; and (c) provided C, who is a public official of the Mapo-si, B and the Mapo-si, with the desire to call for the objection; and (d) collected C with a name tag of crylic on his book.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the crackdown on spirits and the receipt of related civil petitions by viewing B and public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as photographs, etc. (No. 4 No. 1 of the evidence list);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Sentencing - The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order - The fact that the defendant recognized the defendant's wrong and reflects the defendant's wrong, that is the first offender who has no criminal record, and that the damaged public official wants to take the defendant's wife against the defendant, etc. - Other circumstances that are disadvantageous: The crime is inferior in light of the motive, means, methods and results of the crime; and other circumstances: the defendant's age, sex behavior, occupation, family relation, property status, etc.