If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On April 19, 2012, the Defendant: (a) requested the victim F to leave the f to indicate a boundary after conducting a boundary survey; (b) the Defendant was refused to do so; (c) the Defendant f of the Victim G, a wife of the Defendant and the Victim F of the Victim F of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f of the f.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. Statements made by witnesses F and G in the second protocol of the trial;

1. Each legal statement of the witness H and I;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of F, G, Defendant, I, and H;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter and damaged photograph;

1. Registers of cadastral survey results;

1. Application of each statute on filing of a complaint;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant asserts that he was assaulted by F and G, and that he did not inflict any injury on F and G.

According to the above evidence, the defendant demanded F to leave the posts to indicate the boundary after surveying the boundary of the Korean Cadastral Survey within the pents installed around the defendant's house at the time of the instant case, but F did not comply with this, and F did not comply with this, the defendant was knee and knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, kne.