For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court determined that Defendant A’s act constitutes a divulgence of personal information that a person who managed or processed personal information was aware of in the course of performing his/her duties, and that Defendant B’s act constitutes a case where he/she received personal information for profit or for an unlawful purpose, and rejected the Defendants’ allegation of grounds

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the relevant statutes and the legal doctrine and the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the meaning of personal information under Article 59 Subparag. 2 of the Personal Information Protection Act and the subject thereof, as alleged in the grounds of appeal

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.