손해배상(자)
1. As to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 2,00,00 and each of the said money, the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff KRW 157,617,597, Plaintiff B, C, and D, respectively. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 27400, Jul. 26, 2016>
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. (1) The plaintiff A is a person who serves as a police officer.
On July 25, 2015, at around 07:50, the Plaintiff: (a) sent to the site after having received a report from the Defendant that the Defendant was in possession of the GG located in F of the Busan BY, located in GGG, and intended to extract the height of the said vehicle; (b) however, the Defendant: (c) sent the Plaintiff to the vehicle at an rapid exit of the vehicle to the marine traffic guard pursuant to the Suwon 4, and had the Plaintiff escaped to the marine traffic guard; and (d) driven the vehicle going through the opposite part beyond the central line.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). Accordingly, the Plaintiff suffered injuries, such as the pelle of the left-hand pelle, the upper left-hand pelle of the pelle of the pelle, the pelle of the pelle of the pelle of the pelle, and the pelle of the pelle of the pelle of 3,
(2) Plaintiff B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff D is the spouse of Plaintiff A.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Gap evidence 4-1, 2-2, the purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case.
2. Scope of liability for damages
(a) Personal information on lost income (1): as stated in the column for “basic matters” in the annexed amount of damages calculation sheet.
(2) Occupation and income: The Plaintiff, as a police officer, has earned income of KRW 6,027,80 per month.
(3) The Plaintiff was hospitalized from July 25, 2015 to February 26, 2016, and was hospitalized by the Busan Regional Police Agency for the purpose of disclosing that the Plaintiff’s income includes the benefits items that can not be included in the lost income. However, even after the arrival of the inquiry meeting, the Defendant did not present specific arguments regarding this issue.
(4) Full damage to the Mabrone disorder and labor ability loss rate (A) the left-hand Mabrone disorder: The part of Ma Mabrone disorder assessment method
Ⅱ 27% for E-B.