When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is in Kimhae-si, around 15:30 on November 18, 2015.

Gu. From the victim E (the age of 59) who asserts that the right of retention is exercised on the building at the site of the removal of the D building, “I would be unable to remove the building due to the right of retention,” and “I would like to remove the building. I would like to look at the victim’s sound, “I would like to remove the building,” and “I would like to take four weeks of treatment on the left chest and the left part of the left side of the building by one hand while I would like to see the victim’s hump.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Examination of suspect suspect of E by the police;

1. Determination as to the Defendant and defense counsel’s assertion on copies of the general medical certificate, photographs of damaged parts

1. Since the Defendant did not exercise violence against the victim, the injury of the victim’s judgment (hereinafter “the injury of this case”) is merely an injury inflicted upon the victim or an injury caused by another cause.

2. In light of the following circumstances revealed through the evidence of the judgment, it is reasonable to view that the instant injury was caused by the Defendant’s act of action, and thus, the Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion is not acceptable.

The victim was diagnosed at the hospital on the day of the instant case with the “scarcity of the scarke wall” and “any other knife of hand and hand” (the instant injury), and the medical certificate (a copy of the general medical certificate) published as of December 28, 2015 stated that the Defendant was diagnosed by three days and received treatment, such as being administered for nine days.

In addition, the victim taken his left chests and lushes, etc. after several hours of time after coming to the hospital on the day of the instant case, and the body was taken on the part of the victim, and the form of the blood transfusion and the hole was taken on the part of the victim.

B. At the time of the instant case, the victim inflicted bodily injury upon the Defendant, and the Defendant.