A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A is a person who operates a game room in the name of "D" on the second floor in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, and Defendant B is an employee in the above game room.

1. No person who defendant A shall provide game products for the distribution or use, the contents of which are different from the classification obtained by the Game Products Management Committee, or display or keep them for such purposes;

From July 13, 2018 to July 19:10, 2018, the Defendant installed 50 game software products of Rags (rating numberCC-N-1712-003) which was rated by the Game Management Committee in the above game site, and provided them for the use of the game products, unlike the rating classification contents, by reading the data of the IC card, the game result of which was recorded, into a separate smartphone, and by searching for the altered game products so that it can be deleted.

As a result, the defendant provided customers with game products different from the contents of the rating.

2. The Defendants’ joint criminal conduct-related business entities shall not use game products to gambling, perform other speculative acts, or leave the Defendants unattended so that they may do so.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired to sell the game item card among customers in cash, and Defendant A, at the same time and place as the date and time as indicated in paragraph (1), had the customers who have found such place obtain points by using the said singging game work, and request exchange of the item card for which the points have been accumulated, the Defendants made them possible to exchange the item card. Defendant B, as above, had the customers perform the speculative act by giving guidance to enable them to exchange the item card.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to commit gambling and other speculative acts by using game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ two-time statements are made.