One (No. 1) shall be forfeited from seized cellular phone (galthoop8 lus).

around March 2018, the defendant is between the victim B (n, 15 years old) and the victim B (n, 15 years old).

The defendant had a mind that the victim puts the victim's photograph prior to his male-parent body into the Mesengeric photo, and had a mind that he would spread his sexual intercourse video in his possession.

Accordingly, on August 14, 2018, the Defendant, using the mobile phone C Massen on 2018, using the victim, “if it is necessary to take place in order to cover the fluence,” “we need to take fluort multiples, fluor, and fluort,” “I want to see”, “I would fluor, urine, D, E, the Internet, fluor, fluor, so many families, and families, fluor, fluor, fluor, and fluor, fluor, and fluort means, fluor, and fluor, 1) and 0) of the victim’s face from the Internet or D, fluort, fluor, and 1) of the victim’s face, fluort, and fluort, fluor, fluor, and 3) of the victim’s face from the Internet or D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning B;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of a summary of the C dialogue statute

1. Relevant Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Confiscation Article 48 of the Criminal Act