손해배상(기)
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against Defendant A Religious Organization D's loss exceeding the amount ordered to be paid below.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except as otherwise determined in paragraph 2 with respect to the preliminary set-off which Defendant Union added by this court.
Therefore, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
[Revision] At the bottom of the fourth page the following shall be added:
On October 12, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant Labor Union hold a regular labor union on 50 occasions respectively (the Plaintiff shall attend 76 out of 127 members, and the Defendant Labor Union shall attend 9 out of 153 members) and reported and promote the contents of the instant agreement at the 100 assembly of the above A religious organization and the 100 assembly. The 5th 10th 10th 5th 5th 5th “A evidence 9-1” shall be deemed as “A evidence 7-1, 2, 3, 9-1, 12, and 12.”
9. The "reasonable price of real estate" in 15 pages shall be deemed to be "reasonable price", and the "appraisal" shall be deemed to be "appraisal of the first instance court".
10.On the 10th day after the following:
“1) The damage claim due to nonperformance occurs due to a claim for which the deadline is not fixed, and the delay liability occurs from the day following the date on which the claim is made for the performance, and thus the delay damages are recognized
10 pages 3, “ until May 29, 2018, which is the date of the pronouncement of the instant judgment,” shall be deemed to read “within June 4, 2019, which is the date of the pronouncement of the instant judgment.”
The 10th 13th 17th 17th 13th 20.
"To the end, as follows:
However, according to the above evidence and the purport of the whole arguments, the plaintiff and the defendant association are already representatives and members, unique rules and organizations, and are non-corporate associations with the substance of the non-corporate association, such as performing duties under Article 6 of Chapter X of the General Assembly of Religious Organizations. The agreement in this case is effective agreements between the plaintiff and the defendant association, which are non-corporate associations, in the participation of the subdivision committee under the A religious organization.
Therefore, it is true.