beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2017.01.19 2016고단707

사기등

Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years;

2.However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2016 Highest 707" operates F Co., Ltd., and G operates H, and I operates J Co., Ltd.

1. On February 2, 2006, the Defendant prepared a false contract, etc. as if he did not receive the server device from G and H even though he did not receive the server device, and submitted it to the Small and Medium Business Corporation to obtain facility loan.

On March 7, 2006, the Defendant: (a) at the office of the victim located in G and G in Gwangju Mine-gu around March 7, 2006; (b) at the office of the victim, the fact was that the Defendant: (c) the Defendant: (d) the above H submitted the above standard contract, etc. received from G to the victim; and (d) the said H submitted the said standard contract, etc., and applied for knowledge-based service support funds, and (e) the Mail server 1; (d) the Section server 1; (c) the Section server 1; (d) the Section server 1; and (e) the Firewing server 1 to the Section 185,587,600; (e) as if the Defendant sold the above, G sold the above standard contract and tax account; and (e) the Defendant submitted

9. A loan of KRW 144,00,000 was received with a new bank account in the above H’s name.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim in collusion with G.

2. Around January 2006, the Defendant: (a) submitted to the Small and Medium Business Corporation a supply contract in which the J Company, at the time of Franpo City L, collected the supply price of the software sold to the said F by the J Company; and (b) intended to obtain a loan of facility funds.

At the office of the victim in Gwangju Mine-gu around March 7, 2006, the defendant prepared and delivered to the defendant a supply contract, a written estimate, and a written promise of attribution of ownership in full payment of the price, etc. as if the J company sold to the above F the amount equivalent to KRW 57,932,166, and as if the above J company supplied the above F with KRW 124,316,50,00, the amount of KRW 124,316,00. The defendant received the above supply contract from the I.