However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

After the Defendant became aware of the so-called “work loan” business operator who received a loan from a financial institution by forging documents, etc. through online site search, the Defendant conspiredd with the above business operator B, C, D, etc., and the Defendant, even though the Defendant did not have concluded a lease contract with the E-owned lending, concluded a lease contract with the above lending and paid the lease deposit, thereby forging a multi-household/long-term/loan contract, etc. as if the lease deposit was paid, thereby obtaining a loan from a financial institution as security.

1. In collusion with B, C, and D, on December 2, 2012, the Defendant committed the act as if the Defendant was a lessee at the G Licensed Real Estate Agent Office located in Hamsan-si, Hamsan-si, Hamsan-si, Hamsan-si, Hamsan-si, Hamsan-si, Hamsan-si, Hamsan-si, Hamsan-si, Hamsan-si, Hamsan-si, Hamk-si, Ham-si, Ham-si, Ham-si, Ham-si, Ham-si, Ham-si, Ham-si, Ham-si, Ham-si, Ham-si, Ham-si, and Ma, and signed the seals of E, who was aware of in advance on the name of

Accordingly, in collusion with B, C, D, etc., the Defendant forged one of the multi-household/long-term/Loan Agreement in the name of E, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On December 24, 2012, the Defendant, in collusion with B, C, D, etc., filed an application for a loan to an employee in charge of lending that may not know the forgery, and submitted the forged multi-household/Do lease contract as if it were duly concluded.

3. The Defendant, in collusion with B, C, and D, submitted a forged multi-household/sublet loan agreement to the employees in charge of the above bank loan at the time and place of the above “paragraph 2,” and the Defendant submitted the same to the building owner a deposit amount of KRW 140 million.