However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is between the husband of the victim B and the husband of the victim.

At around 21:50 on April 14, 2014, the Defendant, at the victim’s house located in Yangju-si, told the Defendant to the Defendant’s wife that the Defendant was not living in another female, and attached 5 parts of LED TV equivalent to the market price of KRW 7.90,025,00, which was located in the living room owned by the victim, to the bottom of the Defendant’s home located in Yangju-si. At around 21:50 on April 14, 2014, the Defendant added 5 parts of which the market price is unknown to the front and door, and added 285,00,000 won in total, to the compcomlick, the sum of the market price of KRW 1.5,500,00 in glass and door.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. B of the prosecutor's protocol of interrogation of the defendant

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. A written estimate attached to a prosecutor's investigation report;

1. Customer record cards, a purchase contract, and each receipt;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act: Damage to property in the same criminal records and the house of other persons; and

The favorable circumstances: The defendant has no record of crime beyond the suspension of execution, and the motive for the crime of this case and the relationship with the victim. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.