However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

At around 00:50 on June 16, 2015, the Defendant reported to the police officer E who was dispatched to the site upon receiving a report from 112 on the D main points located in 00:50 on June 16, 2015.

What is why is not miscellaneous? Cropic kickh.

n. Doz. Doz. Maz. Maz. Maz. Maz. equally

h. We cannot be able to see the same gue in our country.

'I am on the left face of the above E by drinking with a large amount of 'I am on the left face of the E'.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes notifying departments related to reporting 12 cases;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. An act of obstructing the execution of official duties by a defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (a favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing below) is highly unfavorable to the defendant, and the fact that the defendant confessions the crime of this case and objects to it, and that the defendant has no criminal record above the suspended sentence and has no criminal record within the last ten years is favorable to the defendant.

In addition to the above circumstances, all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case shall be determined as per the disposition.