beta
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2015.06.19 2015가단8683

유체동산인도

Text

1. The Defendants shall deliver to the Plaintiff movable property listed in the separate sheet.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

3...

Reasons

The facts that the Defendants possessed the movables listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant movables”) do not conflict between the parties, and comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings in the written evidence Nos. 1 through 4, the Plaintiff was awarded a successful bid of KRW 3,00,000 for corporeal movables owned by the Defendants, including the instant movables in March 11, 2015, in the instant case of seizure of corporeal movables (No. 2014No. 13355, Mar. 11, 2015). The fact that the delivery execution was made on March 31, 205 only for the goods adjudicated by the Plaintiff except for the instant movables, for which it is impossible to take them out by the entrance, and that the Defendants did not cooperate in the delivery of the instant movables through windows, etc. other than the entrance.

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendants are obligated to deliver the movables of this case to the plaintiff, so the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.