2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on July 27, 201 with a short-term visa (C-2) visa on July 27, 201 and applied for refugee recognition to the Defendant on October 10, 201.

B. On March 22, 2013, the Defendant rendered a disposition denying the recognition of refugee status on the ground that the Plaintiff does not constitute a case of “a well-founded fear of persecution” as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

C. On April 22, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on April 22, 2013, but was dismissed on December 23, 2013.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 1, the purport of whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is an extremely unstable state, such as the frequent occurrence of terrorism.

From around 2005 to February 201, the Plaintiff operated a store in which a video tape, music record, etc. are rented out and sold (hereinafter “instant store”) with a winger B, a birth agent, and a video tape, music record, etc.

However, around January 201, there was a dispute between the Plaintiff and the person who borrows video tapes at the instant store and the video tape is not good in the status of the video tape.

Afterwards, the Plaintiff made intimidation to the Plaintiff’s Dongs that “I knew that I would sell adult video tapes at the instant store, so I would not operate the instant store,” but the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s Dongs continued to operate the instant store.

Then, on February 18, 201, 190, 1999, 201.2.2.2.2.2.2.

Since then, the leth century continues to be used to kill the plaintiff.