If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On July 4, 2014, around 19:20, the Defendant: (a) reported 112 to the effect that a taxi customer spaw at the upper 480 jun-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, and called, “The crime of interference with business may be established if the police officer would take a bath to a taxi engineer without getting a continuous taxi at the taxi,” and (b) made a serious bath to the above police officer; (c) made the above police officer spaw at the taxi, and sent the above police officer spaw at the taxi, and sent the defendant to the police officer as a flagrant offender for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties; (d) made the chest of the above police officer who tried to arrest the defendant as a flagrant offender for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties; and (e) made the head of the above police officer spawn by taking the head of the police officer spawn, and obstructed the police officer’s body and the rear seat of the defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or C;

1. Application of investigation reports, criminal motion images CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, argued that the crime of this case was not memory because the Defendant was in the state of drinking from 2 p.m. to 2 p.m. at the time of the instant case. However, according to the criminal video CD, at the time of committing the crime, the Defendant was in a state that there was no particular hindrance to the movement of the Defendant, such as the Defendant’s appearance, clearly and immediately getting off from a taxi and walking, etc., and even if so, the Defendant committed considerable humiliation and assault against a police officer performing official duties several times in uniform.

As the defendant's act can peep into a light of the legal order, the case in this case is not easy.

, however, the defendant.