When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B Poter cargo vehicles.

On May 4, 2020, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle around 09:14, and led to two lanes between the two lanes between the two lanes between the two lanes between the two lanes between the two lanes, where the new intersection in 30-2, the efficienzine 30-2, the efficienzine efficienzine.

Since there is a long distance intersection where signal lights are installed, all drivers of vehicles have a duty of care to live well on the front side and the left side, and to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so, due to the negligence of the head of the stop, and instead of neglecting this, was driven by the victim C (the 67 years old) who was working on the right side of the letotob, which was driven by the victim C (the f7 years old) who was working on the letobs of the letobs of the letob, the letob in front of the left side of the truck of the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence during the period of treatment, such as the decline in recognition function, decrease in history of death, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a medical certificate with a disability remaining after the defendant's legal statement, a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a site photograph of the accident, and a report on internal investigation (the scene of the accident, a photograph of the otobane, the screen screen and image attachment)

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing factors indicated in the pleadings of this case, such as the defendant's age, environment, sexual conduct, motive, means and consequence of the crime, following the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the factors of sentencing as stated in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime.

Unfavorable circumstances: The defendant violated a stop signal and caused the victim to be able to drive a motor vehicle while normal operation.