2. The fact that the defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case and reflected it is an element of sentencing favorable to the defendant.

However, in full view of all the following facts: (a) the Defendant committed the crime of fraud on October 19, 2014 among the instant crimes; (b) all the other crimes except the Defendant committed the crime of fraud on October 19, 2014 during the period of repeated crime; (c) the Defendant repeats the crime of interference with business; (d) the degree of force exercised by the Defendant is serious and is short of the time to interfere with business; (c) the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol; (d) the Defendant has been punished several times with the previous department; (e) the Defendant has been punished several times; and (e) the Defendant has not received correspondence or recovered damage from the victims; and (e) the sentencing factors of the Defendant’s sentence against the Defendant and

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.