상해
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds of appeal does not permit the defendant to walk the victim's bridge, and the injury inflicted on the victim's parent, etc. as stated in the judgment below is the victim's own injury to the victim's house when the victim's parent, etc. gets on his/her house to attack him/her and the defendant.
Even if the victim suffered bodily injury beyond the defendant's appearance, it constitutes self-defense or legitimate act by an act to defend the victim's attack.
Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below that found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.
2. Determination
A. In full view of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, the lower court convicted the Defendant on the ground that the Defendant could sufficiently recognize the fact that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim’s bridge by walking the bridge.
1) 피해자 C은 수사기관에서부터 이 법정에 이르기까지 일관되게 피고인과 시비를 하는 과정에서 피고인이 발길질을 하려고 하여 피해자가 한쪽 발을 들고 양손을 휘저으며 피고인이 다가오지 못하게 막았는데, 피고인이 발로 피해자의 왼쪽 다리를 걷어차는 바람에 땅바닥에 넘어졌고, 구급차를 타고 가서 무릎 부분에 수술을 받았다고 진술하고 있다. 2) 목격자 F도 수사기관과 이 법정에서 피고인과 피해자가 서로 붙잡고 몸싸움을 하였는데, 피해자가 한쪽 발을 들고 있는 상태에서 피고인이 피해자의 다리를 걸어 넘어뜨렸는지 찼는지는 모르지만 피해자가 땅바닥에 넘어져 119 구급차가 올 때까지 일어서지 못하였다고 진술하였다.
3. In addition, the defendant's cohabiting female G is also walking the victim due to his birth.