사문서위조등
Defendant
The imprisonment with prison labor for A shall be either one year and ten months, and the imprisonment with prison labor for Defendant B shall be eight months and the imprisonment with prison labor for Defendant C.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A and B are siblings who are engaged in the mobile phone sales business, and G, H, and I are the solicitation duty to provide allowances for each mobile phone and recruit subscribers. Defendant C is a person who, from June 1, 2012 to March 1, 2013, takes over a mobile phone sales store in his/her trade name; L is a person who, from March 2013 to March 2013, operates a mobile phone sales store in his/her trade name; and N is a person who, from March 1, 2013 to Southern-gu, operates a mobile phone sales store in his/her trade name.
1. K-related crimes;
A. Defendants A, C’s fabrication of private documents, and uttering of a falsified document, were issued through G, H, I, I, and Defendant A through H with a forged identity certificate, driver’s license, etc., which he forged by G, and used the forged identity certificate, and opened the cell phone from “K” in the operation of Defendant C, and conspired to sell it with a cellphone.
Defendant
A around the end of November 9, 2012, around H, delivered to Defendant C a copy, etc. of the forged Q’s resident registration certificate delivered from G via H, and Defendant C entered “ Q” in the subscriber column using a sclick-type sclock in the cell phone subscription application that was kept in the above K office on November 9, 2012, and sent the copy of the said application to the staff in charge of communications who knew of the forgery by facsimile as if they were duly formed.
As a result, the Defendants forged and used one copy of the application for mobile phone entry in the above Q Q’s name, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, in collusion with G, H and I for the purpose of uttering, as well as forged and used it from March 13, 2013 to March 13, 2013, and forged and used 68 copies of the application for mobile phone entry, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, respectively.
B. Defendants A and C’s violation of the Resident Registration Act in collusion with each other.