When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is the representative director of the LAC which has an office in Busan Shipping Daegu B and B 1001, and the above company is the sales of "D", which is a food waste crushing machine, as its main business.

1. On January 9, 2014, the Defendant against the victim E: (a) had F, a business employee, install the victim’s house of the victim E (n, 44 years of age) G apartment 608, Busan, Suwon-gu G apartment 608, which is a house of the victim E, “D” in fact free of charge. On the other hand, if KB national card pays 700,000 won of the machine value with the KB national card, the Defendant paid 22,000 won per month from the company for every 36 months and sent the latter once every six months.”

However, in fact, the defendant was paying the office rent by obtaining credit loans, and the machinery purchased 3.10,00 won per 1 unit from H was leased to consumers with 700,000 won, and operated the company in such a way that it was impossible to generate profits by concluding an agreement with 792,00 won in total (36 months x 22,00 won) on behalf of consumers. Therefore, there was no intention or ability to pay for it as above.

The Defendant had the said victim settle 700,000 won with the KB National Card in the name of the expenses for the lease of the said crushing machine around that time, thereby acquiring property profits equivalent to the said amount.

2. On January 14, 2014, the Defendant: (a) caused F, a business employee, to make the said victim make a false statement as stipulated in paragraph (1) of this Article; (b) around January 14, 201, the Victim I (33 years of age); (c) Busan Shipping Daegu Apartment 102 Dong 1001, which is the victim I (33

The Defendant had the said victim settle 700,000 won with the KB National Card in the name of the expenses for the lease of the said crushing machine around that time, thereby acquiring property profits equivalent to the said amount.

3. On March 13, 2014, the Defendant, against the victim K, had L, a business employee, make the said victim make the said victim make a false statement as referred to in paragraph (1), as stated in paragraph (1).