However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a wing and cargo vehicle B.

On August 11, 2013, the defendant driving the above cargo vehicle at around 19:45, and let the driver turn to the left from the intersection of the target shooting distance in the Busan Gangseo-gu-do to the Kimhae Airport's surface.

Since there is a place where a signal is installed, there was a duty of care to safely drive a motor vehicle in accordance with the signals by checking well the front left left by a person engaged in driving the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to comply with the signal and received the part on the front part of the said cargo vehicle, which was driven by the victim C (the aged 53) who was driven in accordance with the vehicle progress signal from the north Sea Airport to the seat of the Kimhae Airport.

The Defendant, by its occupational negligence, sustained each injury to the victim C, such as salt dynasiums, etc. in need of approximately eight weeks of medical treatment, and fynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium 51.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of C and E;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (including the fact that a vehicle is covered by a comprehensive insurance);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;