beta
(영문) 전주지방법원군산지원 2020.11.27 2020고단224

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

The defendant 170,00 won to F applicant for compensation, and 100,000 won to H who applied for compensation.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant of “200 Godan224” sells S10 cell phoness on the Internet “K” bulletin board using a cell phone around October 25, 2019, from around October 25, 2019.

On December 15, 2019, a written statement stating that “A will sell a mobile phone if sending 440,000 won to the Mbank account in the name of the victim.” However, even if the Defendant received the sales price of the mobile phone from the victim, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to sell the mobile phone. The Defendant received 440,000 won from the victim to the M Bank account in the name of the Defendant on October 25, 2019, and received 440,000 won from the victim on December 16, 2019, as shown in the attached Table of Crimes (1) as stated in the facts charged, and it is deemed that there is no clear error and there is no obstacle to guaranteeing the Defendant’s actual right to defense. Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving 17 victims over 17 times until the correction as above, obtained a total of 2,937,00 won from the victims on the Internet bulletin at around 19, 2005.”

The term "" posted a letter of title, and falsely read to the victim'sO who reported it that "to send the price to a door-to-door if the price of the goods is paid."

However, since the defendant did not have the above mobile phone, even if he received the price of goods from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the mobile phone.

The Defendant, from February 25, 2020 to February 25, 2020, received the transfer of KRW 220,000 from the victim to the P bank account in the name of A on the same day, and received the transfer of the mobile phone price in the name of the mobile phone price, and from that time until February 25, 2020, 70,000 won stated in the facts charged as KRW 3,00,00 in total, in total 34 times, is apparent that it is a clerical error and impeding the Defendant