When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. In around 17:00 on September 6, 2015, the Defendant damaged a steel network fence by taking up three columns in both hands, by cutting off the steel network fence in an amount of KRW 53,500 at the market price on the ground that the Defendant installed, without permission, a steel network fence in a factory in which the mother of the Defendant C (76 aged) resides, and the Defendant installed a steel network fence in a factory in which his mother resides.

2. At the time and place set forth in paragraph 1, the Defendant destroyed the steel-conditioning network fence as above and removed the victim, and then installed the victim with the mind that the Defendant laid down the trees he he satis in a place other than the victim’s land and installed the steel-conditioning network fence at another place.

‘I am the victim’s “I am the Defendant’s land not so far.”

The victim threatened the victim with the desire and altitude, such as “Seman Yeman Yeng”, which is a dangerous object, without participating in a routing defect, and was in diameter to threaten the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. Application of each investigation report (the sequence 8,10 of the list of evidence) and each of the subordinate statutes to attached materials;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Provisional Payment Order lies in somewhat considering the motive and circumstances of the crime, such as leading up to the instant crime, in the process of dispute over the establishment of a fence with the victim.

The defendant was committed by the crime of this case, and his mistake is divided, and there is no particular record of the crime in addition to the previous conviction of a fine for a different kind of crime.

However, on the other hand, the defendant.