On September 4, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to three months of imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju District Court's net support on September 4, 2008, and was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 500,000 as a fine for the same crime in the same court on February 9, 2012. On April 17, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for special larceny, etc. in the Gwangju District Court's net support, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Gwangju District Court's prison on October 16, 2013. On January 22, 2014, the same court appealed six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (free license) and is still pending trial.

Criminal facts

On February 1, 2014, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license on February 1, 2014, driven a 3-laned vehicle with the blood alcohol concentration of 0.077%, while driving the Cunstst Operating Vehicle at the 0.07% of the blood alcohol concentration, and driven the three-lane road from the right side of the YTU to the YTM, along with three-lanes from the YTM.

At the time, the signal is installed at night and at the front, so the person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to reduce the speed and to ensure the well-being of other vehicles that are in progress in the signal lights and the front door, and to prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, found the victim D(SM5) driving in the front of the signal in the front of the road by negligence, while neglecting this, and then found the victim D(44 years old) driving late and took urgent action, but did not stop, and received the part of the Defendant’s vehicle back to the front part of the damaged vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant did not immediately stop and stop the damaged vehicle so that the amount of KRW 1,662,078, such as repair costs, such as exchange and maintenance of the panions, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence, and at the same time, the Defendant did not take measures such as providing relief to the victim.