2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) On or around June 5, 2014, the Plaintiff is the Defendant of Gyeyang-gu Seoul Building Construction Corporation (hereinafter “instant construction”).

D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “D”) contracted

3) From the Corporation’s perspective, the electrical construction of the instant construction (hereinafter “instant electrical construction”).

(2) However, it was revealed that D did not hold a license for the electrical construction business during the process of performing the instant construction, and accordingly, the Plaintiff entered into the instant electrical construction contract under the same conditions as before and on behalf of the Defendant, via E, the Director of the Building General who was in charge of the instant construction on behalf of the Defendant, under the same conditions as before. However, the date of the contract was retroactively prepared.

3) Meanwhile, while the plaintiff is running the electrical construction of this case, the construction cost of KRW 10 million was additionally incurred as a result of performing the alteration work with a consultation with the defendant to extend the main unit and each unit of the unit of the unit of the electrical construction of this case and changing the unit of the unit of the cable. At the defendant's request, the construction cost of KRW 2 million was additionally incurred according to the defendant's implementation of the additional construction at four unit of the toilet. On the other hand, since the construction cost of KRW 100,000 was revoked at the time of the electrical construction of this case, the construction cost of KRW 8,40,000,000,000 ( KRW 5,5,000,000 won - KRW 1,40,000 won - KRW 1,400,000,000,000 and KRW 5,000,0000,000,000) was paid to the plaintiff.

2 Of these, E shall issue a tax invoice from the Defendant.