beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.07.25 2019고단390

사기등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Seized evidence 1 to 4 shall be confiscated.

The defendant is an applicant for compensation.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【2019 order 390】 The Defendant received a proposal from 2% of the total amount of money when he received and delivered money from an employee of singishing (hereinafter “F”) introduced from Ma-dong E, and accepted it.

On December 28, 2018, at least 09:00 on December 28, 2018, the employee under the name light call from the victim G to the victim H investigator and I prosecutor of the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor’s Office, and “the head of a passbook is used in fraud, and the amount of damage is at least 20 billion won.” He/she finds that he/she is a victim or a suspect at his/her bank; he/she will return money to the Financial Supervisory Service if it is confirmed that he/she has no suspicion later; and the defendant will return money again if he/she is confirmed to have no suspicion later; and the defendant, at around 13:15 of the same day, was carried out as if he/she is an employee of the Financial Supervisory Service in front of the branch office in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul High Court on the same day, and received the victim a false “financial crime track track” document in the name of the Chairperson from the Financial Services Commission to the date of delivery of KRW 16360,000,000 from the victim.

As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with the victims of the so-called “F” and other employees of the so-called “F,” by deceiving the victims, and obtained a total of KRW 17,716,00 from the victims, respectively.

【2019 Highest 2624】 The Defendant conspired in sequence with the name, non-indicteds, who are the causes of the Bosing Telecommunications Fraud Organization, and falsely speaks that the Defendant would withdraw money in the above account and return it after confirmation to the Financial Supervisory Service employees because the victim’s account was used for the crime because he/she misrepresented to the prosecution or any other investigation agency by posting a telephone to many and unspecified persons, and the Defendant would return it after confirmation. The Defendant shall issue the direction of “F” under L.