2. The crime of this case is deemed to have committed an indecent act by making two victims, who do not have any way from the elevator and stairs used by the defendant in large numbers, by drinking up the buckbucks, or by inserting the hand with the knicks, etc. In light of the interview and interview of the crime, the method and contents of the crime, etc., the victims are likely to suffer considerable mental pain, and the defendant did not receive a letter from the victims until now, but the judgment of the court below seems to have determined the punishment in consideration of all the above sentencing factors.

In full view of these circumstances, comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant led to the confession of and reflects in depth on the Defendant’s crime; (b) the Defendant has liveded for more than three months; and (c) the Defendant has no record of being punished in the Republic of Korea for the same and similar crimes; and (d) the equity in sentencing with the same and similar incidents; and (c) the Defendant’s age, career, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (d) other various sentencing conditions indicated in the argument of this case,

Therefore, the prosecutor's above assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.